|
|
For example, the purchase of devices is planned and the ordering party expects one general contractor/supplier, which limits the possibilities for contractors/suppliers to apply and at the same time the ordering party does not have a proper justification for such a procedure. Such an irregularity may result in the refund of % of the funding. Failure to comply with the deadline for submitting offers or failure to extend the deadlines for submitting offers in the event of significant changes to the procurement documents As part of submitting offers, specific deadlines are set (minimum deadline for submitting offers) when the offer must be visible to contractors/suppliers.
If the ordering party shortens the deadline specified in the relevant provisions by at least % or if the deadline is no longer than days , the percentage of the subsidy refund is % . If the contracting authority shortens the deadline specified in the relevant provisions by at least % but photo retouching by less than % , the percentage rate for reimbursement of the subsidy is % . If the contracting authority shortens the deadline specified in the relevant provisions by at least %, but by less than %, or in the event of a significant change in the procurement documents, does not extend the deadline for submitting offers , the percentage of the subsidy.
If the contracting authority shortens the deadline specified in the relevant provisions by less than % , the percentage rate for reimbursement of the subsidy is % . Failure to provide potential bidders/candidates with sufficient time to obtain procurement documentation or restrictions on obtaining procurement documentation The time for economic operators (i.e. potential tenderers/candidates) to obtain is too short (i.e. less than or equal to % of the deadline for submission of tenders specified in the tender documents, in accordance with the applicable regulations), which creates an unjustified obstacle to opening public procurement to competition.
|
|
發表於 16:29:03